« Germany: Newspaper wins award by encouraging its community | Main | Germany: Will free papers bring back young readers? »

Friday, September 09, 2005

How Wikipedia's rising recognition may affect newspapers

The popular Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia, easily holds the distinction of top reference site on the Web with double the traffic of Dictionary.com. In fact, it is so popular that its growth rate, 154% last year according to Reuters, means that it could soon surpass the New York Times and other news sites in terms of page hits. This statistic could have some interesting consequences for the future of newspapers.

The essence of a Wiki is that it is an organic webpage that anyone can edit which results in a 'neutral point of view' article. When "Wikipedians," as contributors are dubbed, post their paragraphs, the information must come from a legitimate source; no original material or personal opinion is allowed. But as recognition of the site grows, Wikipedia is increasingly referenced for breaking news, not just general background information, even more than its own news offshoot, WikiNews. Articles are often posted immediately, as an event unfolds, as opposed to a traditional encyclopedia whose articles are purely retrospect. For instance, in April, Wikipedia had the same percentage of people browsing for info on Pope Benedict as did CNN.com. The difference with Wikipedia is as time passes, more people contribute to an entry that was once breaking news, adding new information and deleting or clarifying that which was disproved, producing well-rounded encyclopedic entries. But much of what is posted is simply a mix of regurgitated content from various newspapers joined together into one article. In this respect, the existence of newspapers nor their journalism are not at all threatened by Wikipedia. It's collaborative wealth of information as well as other online sources could, however, be used by newspapers for the benefit of the reader.

When writing a story, journalists could link to a Wikipedia entry or other reference to provide background information for the reader. Some newspapers such as the Economist, who have detailed explanations of situations in their own database, place links to this info next to their articles to give the reader a foundation for the article they are reading. But few actually link to other sources. Some New York Times columnists have begun linking to other newspapers, but this is more in reference to what other columnists say instead of background.

Adding such background links may be beneficial in holding younger readers attention. Think about a twelve year-old who is asked to do a report on a current events article and finds one concerning the Israeli/Palestinian conflict published in a major national paper. It may be the student's first encounter with the issue and thus, at first glance, the article will not make much sense to the student. But if their were links to background information integrated in the article, the young reader will not only be able to understand the gist of the story, but also may develop an interest in it and begin to follow it daily in the newspaper. This idea is also relevant for anyone who picks up the paper in the middle of a developing story. Online newspapers of the future may thus act as virtual information super-links aside from their role as purveyors of quality journalism.

Keeping this in mind, the future newsroom may have an additional employee: a 'link editor' (if the position ever takes hold I'll try to come up with a more original job title). The bearer of this responsibility would be charged with reading drafts of articles before they are published, adding any relevant links to names, places, events, etc., in the text. The journalist, as many of you may realize, does not have time to complete such a task. The link editor would work from a database and if ever they crossed an obscure reference, would search for background, link it with the article and place it in the database for future reference. It could work in reverse as well: journalists could consult the link editor for quick background on a story idea. Of course, similar functions have already been technologically automated such as a service that links words to a dictionary site, which is useful for improving ones vocabulary. But such a position in a newsroom could result in more informed, fulfilled and happier readers, indeed the type of reader that returns to read your newspaper the following day.

Source: Reuters

Posted by john burke on September 9, 2005 at 05:02 PM in a. Citizen journalism, b. Alliances and partnerships, m. Improving editorial quality, n. Online strategies, p. Newsroom management | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Wikipedia's rising recognition may affect newspapers:

» Breaking news: Journalists discover links from Undercurrent
Inspired by a Reuters piece on Wikipedia's rise and rise, Editors Weblog recommends ...linking: "...the future newsroom may have an additional employee: a 'link editor' (if the position ever takes hold I'll try to come up with a more original... [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 21, 2005 11:03:48 PM

» EU to offer Iran best civil nuclear technology from soil, EU foreign
civilian nuclear technology with Iran if it agrees to halt uranium enrichment on its soil, EU foreign policy [Read More]

Tracked on May 27, 2006 8:37:16 PM

» Netscape DevEdge Back Online from for about fifty
for about fifty days, Netscape DevEdge is back online (as of today at noon, Mozilla time). Mitchell Baker, thanks! [Read More]

Tracked on May 27, 2006 10:57:48 PM

» Firefox 1.0.4 and Mozilla 1.7.8 Security Updates Released from via javascript:
Download Matrix©® for links to the Suite and Firefox. This is merely [Read More]

Tracked on May 28, 2006 1:31:36 AM

» Detroit's Richard Hamilton Fined and Foul Upgraded from Pistons has been
Hamilton of the Detroit Pistons has been fined $15,000 and assessed a Flagrant Foul Penalty Two for unnecessary [Read More]

Tracked on May 28, 2006 10:19:08 PM

» Medical Billing Wiki for Practice Owners and Managers; Collaborative Billing Knowledge Base Improves Practice Profitability and Compliance from billing at Billing
complexity of medical billing as an increasingly formidable challenge to managing a successful practice. As a free, collaborative resource [Read More]

Tracked on May 29, 2006 9:28:06 PM

» Mavs Couldn't Keep Speed from the most of his
dangerous start by once again shuffling his deck with atypical combinations. [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 6, 2006 1:39:29 PM

» Dell Gets Google'd from providing the
personal computers, providing the online search engine leader with another potentially potent weapon in its fierce rivalry with Microsoft [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 6, 2006 10:10:39 PM

» Study Wants Nuclear Weapons Outlawed from on Reducing Threat
on Reducing Threat From "Weapons of Terror" Calls for Outlawing Nuclear Weapons [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 8, 2006 11:30:29 AM

» Critics Blast Al Gore's Documentary As 'Realistic' from The Al Gore-produced
global-warming documentary An Inconvenient Truth is being panned by critics... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 9, 2006 3:34:31 AM

» News from Carroll Publishing from Named President
Trackback URI: http://www.prweb.com/zingpr.php/Q3Jhcy1TcXVhLVRoaXItRW1wdC1JbnNlLVplcm8= [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 12, 2006 5:43:10 AM

» Average American has very high risk of diabetes from Health) - Body
at the Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association. "On average, every [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 18, 2006 7:08:26 AM

» Consumption Of Fish Oil Does Not Appear To Protect Against Abnormal Heart Rhythms from lower risk of
had been thought to have a protective effect, according to a study in the June 14 issue [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 18, 2006 2:07:32 PM

» Opera 8 Reaches 1,000,000 Downloads, CEO Prepares to Swim from for Microsoft's
wish Jon the best of luck swimming across the unforgivingly cold North Atlantic. If someone wants to buy me a round trip ticket to Iceland to interview [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 21, 2006 8:36:32 AM

» Mavericks' Downfall Began In Game 3 from with Dallas in
began in the final six minutes of Game 3 and for one long, miserable week for Mavericks fans, it didn't stop until [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 30, 2006 3:36:14 AM

» NC moves to limit MD role in executions (AP) from state licensing
addressing an issue that has weighed heavily on medical professionals in many states. [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 25, 2006 12:21:36 AM

» Salmons Won't be a Raptor from Raptors in a
the Sixers were to receive a second-round draft choice and the creation of a $2 million trade exception that would have been good for 1 [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 25, 2006 6:39:07 AM

» Saunders Sees Improvement in Rickert from opportunity.
to play in the NBA, and he doesn't have to look far down the list of University [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 25, 2006 8:19:16 AM

» How To Handle Nightmare Neighbors from also reduce the
the value of your home. Money magazine's Eric Schurenberg has some tips on dealing with nightmare neighbors. [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 1, 2006 8:23:57 PM

» Defeating Drowning With the 'Flip and Float' from oung Kids Taught
oung Kids Taught to Calmly Float to Stay Safe [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 8, 2006 10:38:25 AM

» How the West Was Won from a 7-man rotation
thought the Mavs inexperience would lead to a San Antonio Spurs victory in Game 7. Even with [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 10, 2006 4:55:09 PM


Wikipedia is a good source, but...
Sometimes Wikipedia editors don't do good job. Sometimes they make wrong decigions, based on not deep research. Often they have not enough knowledge about subject they working with. As an example recently deleted article "Nadia Russ", which was fully resources. Lots of copies of articles in different newspapers shows nobility of living artist. Another article NeoPopRealism was deleted also as not supported. I cheked all references. Nadia Russ Fan Club http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nadiarussshowroom has all article-references copies in readable size, but editors played game that they don't know that. They state that webspawner website contain article about Nadia Russ, and it's bad reference, anything can be typed in that webspawner. Webspawner.com in that situation was used to help readers, making article located in nadiaruss.com more readable. Original photo-copy located in nadiaruss.com and in http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nadiarussshowroom.
In this case Wikipedia editors were prejudace or air-headed. Both don't improve wikipedia reputation. We need true sources, not made by left foot or not professional editors...

Posted by: Allan at Mar 19, 2007 9:35:04 PM

A 'link editor'? I have two suggestions:
- context editor
- NAI {Network Augmented Intelligence} editor

Machine Augmented Intelligence

Posted by: Dimitar Vesselinov at Sep 12, 2005 2:07:59 AM

It's always cheering to see something you've written used in a newspaper report; and journalists already use Wikipedia as a crib source a LOT.

When Tom Cruise was going through his spectacular public meltdown recently, almost every article on him talked about Xenu, the galactic ruler of Scientology mythology, and they'd clearly gotten it from the Wikipedia article on Xenu, because I could see sentences I'd written lifted directly ;-) Which is good, because we write this stuff to be read and used.

But yes, linking when using Wikipedia as a source would be very nice!

Posted by: David Gerard at Sep 10, 2005 1:59:14 PM